You are given an integer array nums
and an integer goal
. You want to choose a subsequence of nums
such that the sum of its elements is the closest possible to goal
. That is, if the sum of the subsequence's elements is sum
, then you want to minimize the absolute difference abs(sum - goal)
. Return the minimum possible value of abs(sum - goal)
.
Note that a subsequence of an array is an array formed by removing some elements (possibly all or none) of the original array.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [5,-7,3,5], goal = 6
Output: 0
Explanation: Choose the whole array as a subsequence, with a sum of 6. This is equal to the goal, so the absolute difference is 0.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [7,-9,15,-2], goal = -5
Output: 1
Explanation: Choose the subsequence [7,-9,-2], with a sum of -4. The absolute difference is abs(-4 - (-5)) = abs(1) = 1, which is the minimum.
Example 3:
Input: nums = [1,2,3], goal = -7
Output: 7
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 40
-10^7 <= nums[i] <= 10^7
-10^9 <= goal <= 10^9
How would you efficiently find the minimum absolute difference between the sum of any subsequence of nums
and the given goal
?
You are given an array of integers nums
and an integer goal
. The task is to find a subsequence of nums
such that the absolute difference between the sum of the subsequence and goal
is minimized. Return this minimum absolute difference.
The most straightforward approach is to generate all possible subsequences of the input array nums
, calculate their sums, and find the minimum absolute difference between these sums and the goal
. This involves iterating through all possible combinations of elements in nums
.
def min_abs_difference_brute_force(nums, goal):
min_diff = float('inf')
n = len(nums)
for i in range(1 << n): # Iterate through all possible subsequences
current_sum = 0
for j in range(n):
if (i >> j) & 1: # If j-th bit is set, include nums[j] in the subsequence
current_sum += nums[j]
min_diff = min(min_diff, abs(current_sum - goal))
return min_diff
The brute force approach has a time complexity of O(2n * n), where n is the length of nums
. This is because there are 2n possible subsequences, and for each subsequence, we need to compute the sum, which takes O(n) time.
The space complexity is O(1) as we are only using a constant amount of extra space.
Since the constraint 1 <= nums.length <= 40, the brute force approach will result in TLE. A more efficient approach is to use the "Meet in the Middle" technique. We split the array into two halves, generate all possible sums for each half, and then use a two-pointer approach to find the closest sum to the goal.
nums
into two halves, left
and right
.left_sums
and right_sums
, containing all possible subsequence sums for each half. Use recursion for this.right_sums
to enable efficient searching.left_sums
and for each sum, use binary search in right_sums
to find the closest sum that minimizes the absolute difference with the goal
.def min_abs_difference(nums, goal):
def generate_sums(arr):
sums = {0} # Initialize with 0 for empty subsequence
for num in arr:
new_sums = set()
for s in sums:
new_sums.add(s + num)
sums.update(new_sums)
return sorted(list(sums))
n = len(nums)
left = nums[:n // 2]
right = nums[n // 2:]
left_sums = generate_sums(left)
right_sums = generate_sums(right)
right_sums.sort()
min_diff = float('inf')
for left_sum in left_sums:
remaining = goal - left_sum
# Binary search to find the closest value in right_sums
l, r = 0, len(right_sums) - 1
while l <= r:
mid = (l + r) // 2
min_diff = min(min_diff, abs(left_sum + right_sums[mid] - goal))
if right_sums[mid] < remaining:
l = mid + 1
elif right_sums[mid] > remaining:
r = mid - 1
else:
return 0 # Exact match found
# Check the values at indices l and r after the loop finishes
if l < len(right_sums):
min_diff = min(min_diff, abs(left_sum + right_sums[l] - goal))
if r >= 0:
min_diff = min(min_diff, abs(left_sum + right_sums[r] - goal))
return min_diff
The optimal approach has a time complexity of O(2n/2 + 2n/2 log(2n/2)), where n is the length of nums
. This simplifies to O(2n/2 + n * 2n/2 - 1) since generating the sums for each half takes O(2n/2) and sorting takes O(2n/2 log(2n/2)). The binary search contributes O(n * 2n/2) to find the best combination, so, overall, it can be simplified to O(n * 2n/2).
The space complexity is O(2n/2) to store the sums for each half.
By using the meet in the middle approach, we significantly reduce the time complexity compared to the brute-force method, making it feasible for larger input arrays.