You are given a string s
.
A split is called good if you can split s
into two non-empty strings s_left
and s_right
where their concatenation is equal to s
(i.e., s_left + s_right = s
) and the number of distinct letters in s_left
and s_right
is the same.
Return the number of good splits you can make in s
.
For example:
s = "aacaba"
should return 2
.
The good splits are ("aac", "aba")
and ("aaca", "ba")
s = "abcd"
should return 1
The good split is ("ab", "cd")
Write a function to implement this with the most optimal time and space complexity.
When you get asked this question in a real-life environment, it will often be ambiguous (especially at FAANG). Make sure to ask these questions in that case:
The brute force strategy for this problem is all about trying out every single way you can split the given string into two parts. For each split, we check if the two parts are 'good' according to the problem's definition, and count the valid ones.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def num_good_ways_to_split_a_string_brute_force(input_string):
number_of_good_splits = 0
string_length = len(input_string)
for split_index in range(1, string_length):
# Iterate through all possible split positions
left_substring = input_string[:split_index]
right_substring = input_string[split_index:]
distinct_characters_left = set(left_substring)
number_distinct_left = len(distinct_characters_left)
# Count distinct characters on the left
distinct_characters_right = set(right_substring)
number_distinct_right = len(distinct_characters_right)
# Count distinct characters on the right
if number_distinct_left == number_distinct_right:
# Only increment if the split is good
number_of_good_splits += 1
return number_of_good_splits
To efficiently count the splits, we focus on tracking distinct characters from both ends of the string. By comparing these counts, we can determine valid split points quickly. This avoids repeatedly counting distinct characters for every possible split.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def num_good_splits(string):
string_length = len(string)
prefix_unique_counts = [0] * string_length
suffix_unique_counts = [0] * string_length
seen_characters = set()
for i in range(string_length):
seen_characters.add(string[i])
prefix_unique_counts[i] = len(seen_characters)
seen_characters = set()
for i in range(string_length - 1, -1, -1):
seen_characters.add(string[i])
suffix_unique_counts[i] = len(seen_characters)
good_split_count = 0
# Iterate through possible split points.
for i in range(string_length - 1):
# Comparing unique char counts.
if prefix_unique_counts[i] == suffix_unique_counts[i + 1]:
good_split_count += 1
return good_split_count
Case | How to Handle |
---|---|
Null or empty string | Return 0 if the input string is null or empty as there are no ways to split it. |
String with length 1 | Return 0 because a string of length 1 cannot be split into two non-empty substrings. |
String with all identical characters | Return string length - 1 as every split will result in same number of unique characters on both sides. |
Very long string approaching maximum allowed string length | Ensure the solution uses efficient data structures (e.g., hash maps) to avoid time limit exceeded errors. |
String with only two distinct characters and skewed distribution | The solution should handle skewed distributions of characters without causing significant performance degradation. |
Integer overflow when counting unique characters (if applicable) | Use appropriate data types to store counts to prevent integer overflow. |
Memory constraints with extremely long strings | Optimize memory usage by avoiding unnecessary data duplication or large intermediate data structures. |
String contains unicode characters | The solution should correctly count unicode characters as distinct elements in the string. |