Good company culture and values. Good infrastructure among all offices and an ample amount of opportunities.
No cons I have to say so far.
It was a group discussion round. There were four candidates. A topic was chosen, and two were asked to group up. One group was required to speak 'for' the topic, and the other group 'against' the topic provided by the interview panel.
The first round was an aptitude test, similar to Mettl, testing your aptitude, logical thinking, attention to detail, and English language skills. It was a moderate level and not tough to qualify. The next round was a group interview where I was ask
The interview was quite simple, and the interviewer was very accessible. He answered my questions, and in general, I can say that it was a pleasant conversation. The entire interview and conversation process with the company was very efficient, unlik
It was a group discussion round. There were four candidates. A topic was chosen, and two were asked to group up. One group was required to speak 'for' the topic, and the other group 'against' the topic provided by the interview panel.
The first round was an aptitude test, similar to Mettl, testing your aptitude, logical thinking, attention to detail, and English language skills. It was a moderate level and not tough to qualify. The next round was a group interview where I was ask
The interview was quite simple, and the interviewer was very accessible. He answered my questions, and in general, I can say that it was a pleasant conversation. The entire interview and conversation process with the company was very efficient, unlik