Projects are good.
Best training.
More scope for learning.
No cons, as far as I observed.
The interview process was carried out in two stages. The first round is a written test/objective test, and the second round is a technical interview in which the panel members would ask both technical and behavioral questions.
It was a group discussion round. There were four candidates. A topic was chosen, and two were asked to group up. One group was required to speak 'for' the topic, and the other group 'against' the topic provided by the interview panel.
The interview process is easy to crack for this role, but before that, there is one aptitude and coding round which are pretty tough. So, be prepared for those, and you can be sure that you'll crack the interview.
The interview process was carried out in two stages. The first round is a written test/objective test, and the second round is a technical interview in which the panel members would ask both technical and behavioral questions.
It was a group discussion round. There were four candidates. A topic was chosen, and two were asked to group up. One group was required to speak 'for' the topic, and the other group 'against' the topic provided by the interview panel.
The interview process is easy to crack for this role, but before that, there is one aptitude and coding round which are pretty tough. So, be prepared for those, and you can be sure that you'll crack the interview.