Stable so far.
Good people, good benefits, reasonable payment.
Payment not the greatest, slow processes.
Clear, concise, and easy. The interview process was transparent, and the results were shared immediately. A positive experience. Try to adapt video screening over in-person interviews, especially when the candidate is from a different location.
Mainly three parts: 1. HR interview. 2. A technical test (several parts about conceptual, logical, and OOP topics). 3. A technical interview (further discussions based on the test and technical concepts).
The interview took too long, upwards of 3 hours. It was done on Teams, with a lot of people on the call. We went through several rounds of questions (non-technical) and teamwork-building activities.
Clear, concise, and easy. The interview process was transparent, and the results were shared immediately. A positive experience. Try to adapt video screening over in-person interviews, especially when the candidate is from a different location.
Mainly three parts: 1. HR interview. 2. A technical test (several parts about conceptual, logical, and OOP topics). 3. A technical interview (further discussions based on the test and technical concepts).
The interview took too long, upwards of 3 hours. It was done on Teams, with a lot of people on the call. We went through several rounds of questions (non-technical) and teamwork-building activities.