If you start off as an ASE, your life will start off as a gamble. If you are lucky enough, you might land in a good project with great exposure. Otherwise, it can turn out to be sheer bad luck for some, with support work and that too very little.
There are times when there is hardly any work, and you have to fight with peers to get credit for that little work.
Timings are good. Good shuttle facility. Some projects have excellent team outings, while others may have few to none. Salary hikes can be good. It is the very place for those highly fashionable girls, and there is plenty of time for doing make-up.
You need to butter up your seniors and managers. You can get lost in the crowd. A lot of testing work comes up. As for your ratings, your ability to snatch credit will matter the most.
There is a lot of show off on the outside. But the inside is dark and dirty. Please acknowledge hard work and stop favoritism.
It was a three-round process with 1. First round: Manager (30-45 mins) * Background checkup Second round: Technical (1 hr to 1.15 hr) * DSA question * Question from CV * Question from Academics * Specialization Third round: Confirmation round (30
Had 3 rounds of interviews. First, a recruiter round. Second, a Hiring Manager round. Third, a coding challenge. Then, I dropped out. The interview process was too lengthy, scheduled with lots of gaps. Interviewers were cool enough.
The first round was non-elimination behavioral; they asked simple questions. Then it was a math/puzzles round where they gave three puzzles. You were supposed to find the path within the given timeframe and answer some quick-fire math questions wher
It was a three-round process with 1. First round: Manager (30-45 mins) * Background checkup Second round: Technical (1 hr to 1.15 hr) * DSA question * Question from CV * Question from Academics * Specialization Third round: Confirmation round (30
Had 3 rounds of interviews. First, a recruiter round. Second, a Hiring Manager round. Third, a coding challenge. Then, I dropped out. The interview process was too lengthy, scheduled with lots of gaps. Interviewers were cool enough.
The first round was non-elimination behavioral; they asked simple questions. Then it was a math/puzzles round where they gave three puzzles. You were supposed to find the path within the given timeframe and answer some quick-fire math questions wher