There are innumerable options to explore within the company, both technology-wise and industry-wise. This is very good for QA (Testers).
It's a very big brand to be associated with, and it increases your market value. There are many opportunities to be explored. If properly explored, you can spend your whole career in this company.
Few projects have very good on-site opportunities. It is a very women-friendly company. Facilities are also very good. The work culture is good, with a mixed culture and language, and a friendly atmosphere.
Majorly projects are maintenance projects. If you get stuck in any project, it's difficult to get rolled off to another; consequently, your career growth gets stuck. Everything lies with the managers of the project. Your career growth, your roll-off, your vacations, and your exit from the company also depend on them solely. Though there are too many good policies for the employees, the managers exploit them and misuse the policies for their own good. They just run after their billing. HR is of no good. They are like dolls in the hands of the managers.
Infrastructure is going down day by day. They are taking in lots of freshers (from non-IT backgrounds like Fashion Tech. and Bio Tech.) every quarter but making them sit on the bench for no good. The quality of employees is going down. Quality managements are also going down (like cafeteria, house-keeping, and transport). There's no clarity in appraisals. Here also, the managers are the sole deciders. And they do it on the basis of their budgets.
Should take care of stuffs like cafeteria, transport, and housekeeping. The HRs must be more adequate with knowledge. HR should have some say over the managers. There must be someone to whom employees can approach and take help regarding employee policies. There must be someone who can monitor the managers of the projects whether they are working properly or not.
It was a three-round process with 1. First round: Manager (30-45 mins) * Background checkup Second round: Technical (1 hr to 1.15 hr) * DSA question * Question from CV * Question from Academics * Specialization Third round: Confirmation round (30
Had 3 rounds of interviews. First, a recruiter round. Second, a Hiring Manager round. Third, a coding challenge. Then, I dropped out. The interview process was too lengthy, scheduled with lots of gaps. Interviewers were cool enough.
The first round was non-elimination behavioral; they asked simple questions. Then it was a math/puzzles round where they gave three puzzles. You were supposed to find the path within the given timeframe and answer some quick-fire math questions wher
It was a three-round process with 1. First round: Manager (30-45 mins) * Background checkup Second round: Technical (1 hr to 1.15 hr) * DSA question * Question from CV * Question from Academics * Specialization Third round: Confirmation round (30
Had 3 rounds of interviews. First, a recruiter round. Second, a Hiring Manager round. Third, a coding challenge. Then, I dropped out. The interview process was too lengthy, scheduled with lots of gaps. Interviewers were cool enough.
The first round was non-elimination behavioral; they asked simple questions. Then it was a math/puzzles round where they gave three puzzles. You were supposed to find the path within the given timeframe and answer some quick-fire math questions wher