Nice work environment. Good training programs. Nice processes. Very organized and state-of-the-art facilities. Friendly people. Great place to work, especially for women. Good onsite opportunities after a long stay in the company.
Poor pay.
Long working hours, even after the recession.
Promotions are partial and biased and mainly depend on your manager. He is your god.
You don't get recognized for your talent.
Poor retaining policy.
Improve pay and judge people on their talent instead of blindly following the managers. The talent retaining policy must be improved.
It was a three-round process with 1. First round: Manager (30-45 mins) * Background checkup Second round: Technical (1 hr to 1.15 hr) * DSA question * Question from CV * Question from Academics * Specialization Third round: Confirmation round (30
Had 3 rounds of interviews. First, a recruiter round. Second, a Hiring Manager round. Third, a coding challenge. Then, I dropped out. The interview process was too lengthy, scheduled with lots of gaps. Interviewers were cool enough.
The first round was non-elimination behavioral; they asked simple questions. Then it was a math/puzzles round where they gave three puzzles. You were supposed to find the path within the given timeframe and answer some quick-fire math questions wher
It was a three-round process with 1. First round: Manager (30-45 mins) * Background checkup Second round: Technical (1 hr to 1.15 hr) * DSA question * Question from CV * Question from Academics * Specialization Third round: Confirmation round (30
Had 3 rounds of interviews. First, a recruiter round. Second, a Hiring Manager round. Third, a coding challenge. Then, I dropped out. The interview process was too lengthy, scheduled with lots of gaps. Interviewers were cool enough.
The first round was non-elimination behavioral; they asked simple questions. Then it was a math/puzzles round where they gave three puzzles. You were supposed to find the path within the given timeframe and answer some quick-fire math questions wher