Pros: - One of the most competent and well-structured engineering orgs I’ve seen in 15+ years. - Teams are pragmatic and highly skilled; collaboration and knowledge-sharing are part of the culture, not afterthoughts. - Processes are clearly defined and generally helpful without being overly rigid. - People are approachable, and it’s normal (and encouraged) to ask questions or request help — a refreshing cultural norm. - Technical health is solid; legacy systems exist but are being actively addressed with consistent, visible progress. - Business and technical alignment are strong, which creates a sense of stability and focus. - The CEO is experienced in the fintech space and provides steady, thoughtful leadership at the company level.

Cons: - Some teams are clearly understaffed, which limits bandwidth and slows velocity — though leadership tends to acknowledge this rather than push unrealistic goals. - Legacy systems still create friction in some areas, and while progress is real, it's still an ongoing cost.

Pros: Good pay. They cared about mental health.

Cons: Fired just after returning from sick leave.

Pros: Good compensation; my own team's leadership was competent and helpful.

Cons: Some folks could be difficult to work with; people who were known to be discriminatory faced no repercussions.