Pros: Good place for learning and growth. Salary is good for Thailand. Good work-life balance.

Cons: Sometimes work can be overwhelming.

Pros: The tech department is big; you can move to a new team if you need something new. Salary plus bonus is above average when compared to the local average income. Cool benefits include a club budget, non-business travel budget, etc. At least for my team, they accept new ideas and challenges. The work environment is good. There isn't much overtime, even though many people are starting to complain that they're facing more overtime now.

Cons: - Company doesn't care about customers much if it doesn't impact any company's income. - Tech can be boring to work on sometimes. The service and architecture are too big; you often need to talk to 3-5 teams just to change one line of code. - Promotions aren't fully transparent. They're mostly based on a manager, which varies across teams. - The CTO is an AI bro. - The high-level leaders don't have enough diversity. It's mainly one nationality.

Pros: Bangkok location Great people Compensation and benefits

Cons: 1. Inflated Ego Among New Managers: Some newly appointed managers begin to perceive themselves as VIPs, prioritizing personal stature over team welfare. 2. Impact at the Cost of Team Morale: In their urge to "make an impact," they often push changes that serve their image but damage team dynamics, productivity, and motivation. 3. Rise of Internal Politics: Political behavior and favoritism have become prevalent, with decisions influenced by personal biases rather than merit or fairness. 4. Deterioration of Team Culture: A previously healthy, collaborative environment has become toxic, driven by micro-management and unclear expectations introduced under new leadership. 5. Unreasonable Work Expectations: Despite consistently strong performance, I was asked to deliver more in less time, often pressured to work during weekends and off-hours — even when not on-call. 6. Disrespect Toward Work-Life Balance: Critical meetings were deprioritized in favor of task completion, undermining transparency, collaboration, and long-term planning. 7. Lack of Technical Diligence: Managers declined to review a well-structured 5000-line codebase, dismissing the effort involved in delivering new features, even after it being approved by code owners. 8. Disconnected Oversight: There’s a worrying trend of managerial detachment — asking engineers to account for their output manually, while ignoring simple tools and dashboards that clearly reflect contributions.