I was a referred candidate. The whole process was quick; from initial conversation to receiving an offer took less than a month. I took a few weeks to compare other offers and was never rushed into making a decision.
I enjoyed the interviews at Airtable more than I enjoyed mine at several other places, including FAANG and other companies of similar size.
Interviewers were polite and wanted to have a conversation. It felt more like exchanging ideas, as opposed to being interrogated on a strict rubric.
Per company policy, they do not negotiate compensation (really). It wasn't an issue for me because they made a very competitive offer. It was a much better experience than getting low-balled and having to negotiate with competing offers.
I didn't find the interview questions too hard. However, they were high-signal because they focused on real and relevant problems.
The coding challenges were not LeetCode-style. I had to solve simplified versions of real problems that they dealt with, in both the coding and design interviews.
The following metrics were computed from 4 interview experiences for the Airtable Senior Software Engineer role in United States.
Airtable's interview process for their Senior Software Engineer roles in the United States is very selective, failing most engineers who go through it.
Candidates reported having very negative feelings for Airtable's Senior Software Engineer interview process in United States.