The entire hiring process was tedious.
There was one telephonic interview, followed by two take-home assignments, and then a four-hour virtual panel interview.
They knew I was working, but the deadlines they provided for the take-home assignments were not very thoughtful.
I cleared these stages and received great feedback.
Final Round:
A four-hour panel interview.
They sent an email asking me to review the Airtable website and understand its workflows (like CSV import), as the interview would be "low-key" and based on that information. This was peculiar, as it asked a candidate to research their website rather than discuss their skills in a general manner.
During the interview, the interviewers were polite and warm, and I felt the four hours went well.
However, I received a rejection email the next day.
I reached out to HR for basic feedback. She scheduled a call but never followed through.
The following metrics were computed from 3 interview experiences for the Airtable Software Development Engineer In Test (SDET) role in United States.
Airtable's interview process for their Software Development Engineer In Test (SDET) roles in the United States is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having very negative feelings for Airtable's Software Development Engineer In Test (SDET) interview process in United States.