Great people, great work/life balance. In terms of the type of companies that solve the kinds of problems you'd solve at Akamai, the pay is remote class leading, but it's still quite good.
Perhaps it's because there's a corporate raider on the board, but it feels like the company can't execute on long-term visions or invest in true innovation. Most things are focused on short-term margins.
There is also an inefficiency problem when it comes to iterating on software here, which means anything substantive needs a longer runway to execute. This is compounded by the first problem.
That is a problem in a space where they're currently being outpaced by nimbler companies. I'm very much concerned about where Akamai will be in 5-10 years, that's if it hasn't already been chopped up by the raiders on its board.
Initial phone screen, followed by two rounds of interviews. Two non-technical, the rest (six) technical including coding questions and deep tech evaluation. Met with engineers within my organization as well as without, and talked to two different h
All my interviewers were super cool and allowed me enough time to express myself. In the end, they were happy and chose a different candidate based on stack ranking, as communicated to me. The only (hugely) disappointing part was poor as well as inf
Initial phone interview, then onsite. On-site started fine with the manager of the group. The panel interview is where it went off the rails. The panel was trying to flex on each other technically and was more focused on asking esoteric, irrelevant
Initial phone screen, followed by two rounds of interviews. Two non-technical, the rest (six) technical including coding questions and deep tech evaluation. Met with engineers within my organization as well as without, and talked to two different h
All my interviewers were super cool and allowed me enough time to express myself. In the end, they were happy and chose a different candidate based on stack ranking, as communicated to me. The only (hugely) disappointing part was poor as well as inf
Initial phone interview, then onsite. On-site started fine with the manager of the group. The panel interview is where it went off the rails. The panel was trying to flex on each other technically and was more focused on asking esoteric, irrelevant