Most people are nice and helpful.
Salary is fairly competitive for the industry.
In-house barista.
Lack of mentoring. No support whatsoever for professional development or learning. Little focus on addressing technical debt. Poor decision making from management. Poor planning and delivery of projects, especially across teams. The previous negative reviews are accurate.
Listen to your employees and learn from mistakes.
You get a technical OA, which I'm guessing is automatic. This is followed by interview rounds, leading to a fly-out to Chicago for an in-person interview, presumably whiteboard style. However, I didn't make it to the in-person stage.
45 minutes includes a self-introduction and three HackerRank questions: two standard ones and one LRU. HackerRank questions are usually long and need some time to understand, unlike straightforward LeetCode-style problems.
1st Round: HackerRank Online Assessment 2nd Round: Technical Interview Final Round: 4-Panel Technical Interview (1 system design panel) The 2nd round asks to implement an exchange engine. The final round has 4 interviews back-to-back: 1. Technica
You get a technical OA, which I'm guessing is automatic. This is followed by interview rounds, leading to a fly-out to Chicago for an in-person interview, presumably whiteboard style. However, I didn't make it to the in-person stage.
45 minutes includes a self-introduction and three HackerRank questions: two standard ones and one LRU. HackerRank questions are usually long and need some time to understand, unlike straightforward LeetCode-style problems.
1st Round: HackerRank Online Assessment 2nd Round: Technical Interview Final Round: 4-Panel Technical Interview (1 system design panel) The 2nd round asks to implement an exchange engine. The final round has 4 interviews back-to-back: 1. Technica