It is a company that embraces change better than anyone else, ruthlessly. You can be the source of change voluntarily, with the freedom to fail. It is a great engineering company.
The company as a whole has a great vision, but deeper into some places:
Leadership principles are used as check-box criteria for the talent review of the success bureaucracy.
After the recruiter reached out, we exchanged a few emails, and I was sent an assessment to be completed asynchronously. There were two coding questions and a few system design questions.
The interview consisted of multiple rounds. I didn't make it to the panel interview. The basic process, as described by the recruiter, was: * HR call * CodePair * Panel Interview
tl;dr I was ignored for not having a US visa, even though I said I'd need visa sponsorship multiple times. It was a total waste of time. When submitting your application at Amazon, you have to check a box signaling whether you have permission to wor
After the recruiter reached out, we exchanged a few emails, and I was sent an assessment to be completed asynchronously. There were two coding questions and a few system design questions.
The interview consisted of multiple rounds. I didn't make it to the panel interview. The basic process, as described by the recruiter, was: * HR call * CodePair * Panel Interview
tl;dr I was ignored for not having a US visa, even though I said I'd need visa sponsorship multiple times. It was a total waste of time. When submitting your application at Amazon, you have to check a box signaling whether you have permission to wor