Good for resume and advancing out of the company. Some good pockets of leadership within.
A ton of bureaucracy and politics leading to unnecessary engineering work (engineers trying to get promoted by “redesigning” a system that doesn’t need to be redesigned).
Constant reorganizations in poorly managed orgs (leading to a ton of time trying to figure out who owns what, before getting reorged AGAIN).
The org I was in got LESS diverse and more political as time went on because upper-level management kept pulling members of their old org teams into the current one and giving the new members more deference.
It was easy and to the point. The interviewer was sweet and allowed me enough time to think about how to approach solving the problems. The coding question asked was for an inventory and managing it. It was an easy solve with the right data structure
The interview process was quick, consisting of three panels: technical, behavioral, and system design aspects. The interviewers were friendly, approachable, and helpful. Overall, it was a very positive and smooth experience.
First was an exam of problem-solving with 2 questions. Then 4 interviews over 2 days, or all in 1 day after the exam passed, but I didn't join them; I just did the exam.
It was easy and to the point. The interviewer was sweet and allowed me enough time to think about how to approach solving the problems. The coding question asked was for an inventory and managing it. It was an easy solve with the right data structure
The interview process was quick, consisting of three panels: technical, behavioral, and system design aspects. The interviewers were friendly, approachable, and helpful. Overall, it was a very positive and smooth experience.
First was an exam of problem-solving with 2 questions. Then 4 interviews over 2 days, or all in 1 day after the exam passed, but I didn't join them; I just did the exam.