Lots of options for developers - you can usually choose what you want to work on and how you want to work.
Everything varies team-to-team, but it's universally positive.
The path to promotion is very clear and encouraged.
Problems are challenging, if not always unique/interesting.
The environment supports and encourages quick learning.
Everything is built around isolated teams. The company essentially functions as 1000 start-ups moving in a similar (but not the same) direction. This can result in duplicated work and wasted time.
To some extent, this is unavoidable at such a large company. It's very common here to implement a full platform that will be dropped within the year.
There's also quite a cult of personality around the higher-ups.
Everything is moving in a good direction. Just keep working to set clear goals and purposes for teams/orgs. Keep prioritizing ethics and sustainability.
It was good, but they didn't respond to me for a long time after 14 days. I asked them why, but they didn't respond back.
Initial phone call with a recruiter, followed by a 90-minute coding assignment. This consisted of standard LeetCode-style algorithm and data structures problems, loosely related to the specific role and easy to prepare for by using normal resources.
Only one round for the intern position. The first part of the interview was technical questions. I got one "out of the box" question and one LeetCode question created by the interviewer, not on the list. The second part of the interview was behaviora
It was good, but they didn't respond to me for a long time after 14 days. I asked them why, but they didn't respond back.
Initial phone call with a recruiter, followed by a 90-minute coding assignment. This consisted of standard LeetCode-style algorithm and data structures problems, loosely related to the specific role and easy to prepare for by using normal resources.
Only one round for the intern position. The first part of the interview was technical questions. I got one "out of the box" question and one LeetCode question created by the interviewer, not on the list. The second part of the interview was behaviora