I had many opportunities over my period of employment to learn new things. There is a certain egalitarian feel to the culture - young engineers are encouraged to work with and learn from senior engineers, and the opinions and ideas of less experienced employees are not simply dismissed because of their lower "rank".
I was able to move around a little bit within my role and learn many new things over the time of my employment, and I definitely got to work on some interesting projects.
Although I had opportunities to move around and try new things, I was ultimately locked into one role because there was no career path available for me to follow. There is very little mobility, from my experience, to move upward and grow in the company.
I spent nearly a decade doing the same job, with the same job title, despite consistently getting stellar performance reviews. This is why I eventually decided to leave the company.
On an unrelated note, the compensation is simply not competitive. Although I received many stock options in the early years of my employment, the stock stagnated by the time they had vested and they were ultimately worth nothing by the time I decided to leave.
While I was still an employee, I interviewed and received job offers at a few competitors just to see what else was out there, and most of the offers had salaries ranging between 30% and 50% more than my salary at the time, which was very tempting. Most of my coworkers I know who left the company were rewarded with significant salary increases at their new employers.
I enjoyed the work, so I stuck around... but I could have easily left at any time to get a 50% raise at a competitor.
When an engineer has been in the same job for nearly a decade, consistently gets exceptional performance reviews, yet has no path for advancement in the company, then something is wrong.
Clear career paths need to be established in order for employees to grow. Also, compensation is not competitive enough to keep new employees around for the long term.
Started with a college career fair, then moved onto an on-campus interview. A separate team followed up for a phone screen, and then an onsite interview. The interview was mostly technical questions, and a few personal questions.
The interview included both behavioral and technical questions. The technical questions consisted of basic EE principles such as filtering and transistors. I was able to gain a better idea of the job and the company. Overall, it was a very comfortabl
I applied on its official website and got the HR's email to set a technical interview on phone. The technical interview was organized by two engineers about electrical engineering in that group. It's about an optical sensor demonstration project gro
Started with a college career fair, then moved onto an on-campus interview. A separate team followed up for a phone screen, and then an onsite interview. The interview was mostly technical questions, and a few personal questions.
The interview included both behavioral and technical questions. The technical questions consisted of basic EE principles such as filtering and transistors. I was able to gain a better idea of the job and the company. Overall, it was a very comfortabl
I applied on its official website and got the HR's email to set a technical interview on phone. The technical interview was organized by two engineers about electrical engineering in that group. It's about an optical sensor demonstration project gro