Challenging Work, Great Pay
Challenging Work, Great Pay
Very professional and polite co-workers. Whoever wants to push themselves will always be challenged. Pay is more than fair.
Atmosphere of all work, very little time or mindset for fun or group activities.
Additional Ratings
Was this helpful?
Apple Interview Questions
Apple Interview Experiences
Design Verification Engineer
A phone interview was followed by a day-long onsite interview. The phone interview was fairly short, lasting about 45 minutes. I was asked mostly about my current work experience mentioned on my resume. I was also asked to solve a couple of technical
Design Verification Engineer
Two telephone calls with very detailed coding questions. You were literally asked to say the code. Followed by one day of intense interviews (seven interviews total): * Coding * Detailed background knowledge * Overall validation, closure, and design
Design Verification Engineer
I received an email from a recruiter at Apple. They asked me for interview slots and set up a virtual technical meeting. The interview consisted of one coding question, followed by a discussion on why the scoreboard was designed in that particular w
Design Verification Engineer
Cupertino, California, United StatesAugust 1, 2015A phone interview was followed by a day-long onsite interview. The phone interview was fairly short, lasting about 45 minutes. I was asked mostly about my current work experience mentioned on my resume. I was also asked to solve a couple of technical
Design Verification Engineer
London, United KingdomSeptember 1, 2017Two telephone calls with very detailed coding questions. You were literally asked to say the code. Followed by one day of intense interviews (seven interviews total): * Coding * Detailed background knowledge * Overall validation, closure, and design
Design Verification Engineer
Cupertino, California, United StatesJune 1, 2023I received an email from a recruiter at Apple. They asked me for interview slots and set up a virtual technical meeting. The interview consisted of one coding question, followed by a discussion on why the scoreboard was designed in that particular w
