Very attractive salary and stock options plan.
Very large teams dispersed in all geographies. It's hard to communicate and learn, with a lot of time spent in meetings and synchronization.
Poor work-life balance, with meetings at odd times.
The company and management structure is quite bureaucratic. It's hard for newcomers to break into existing cliques.
You don't need such large teams. Break work down into smaller chunks and give full control to local teams. Reduce overhead of meetings and status reporting, etc.
The interview was standard. I was asked about the hardest project I've worked on, as well as if I had any background in networking. However, I felt that the interviewer was extremely rude. I had to ask him to clarify certain questions, as he had a h
One phone call with HR, and one phone call with the group manager. The first day of interviews included two interviews back-to-back, each an hour long. The first interview mainly focused on technical questions, and the second was balanced between te
The first interview was 45 minutes, followed by three back-to-back 30-minute interviews. The people were very kind, and it was a very good interview experience.
The interview was standard. I was asked about the hardest project I've worked on, as well as if I had any background in networking. However, I felt that the interviewer was extremely rude. I had to ask him to clarify certain questions, as he had a h
One phone call with HR, and one phone call with the group manager. The first day of interviews included two interviews back-to-back, each an hour long. The first interview mainly focused on technical questions, and the second was balanced between te
The first interview was 45 minutes, followed by three back-to-back 30-minute interviews. The people were very kind, and it was a very good interview experience.