I've seen some bad reviews on Glassdoor about working at IS&T at Apple, and I feel compelled to share my experience there because I think it was actually pretty great.
Some aspects of corporate culture that I see shared by most (if not all) areas in Apple:
So now the question becomes: how are things different in IS&T from other parts of the company? The answer is that it doesn't really differ. If anything, the impact of what you are working on is larger than in some other areas because a lot of what IS&T does is the foundation that makes consumer-facing products possible to run on.
There are entire companies out there that only make one of the products that a given team in IS&T produces, and there is a good chance that IS&T is doing a better job of it.
While all the teams in IS&T are different, I think that these general principles are true for all of them.
One of the things that I found challenging was the modularity of the teams. By that, I mean that the teams in IS&T don't interact much with other teams except for when they have to for business reasons.
Socially speaking, I don't see a lot of full-time employees eating lunch with people from other teams that often. Also, within my own team, I never really felt like I had a strong social connection to the people I worked with. People were often just coming in and doing their own work without really interacting that much with other people in the cubes around them.
This means that in order to make work friends, you kind of have to go out of your way to initiate contact with other people, which can make the first couple of months of work a little tougher. This was my experience, and I have also heard it echoed by other people in IS&T.
The process started with a recruiter call. Then, I had a technical screening. Lastly, there was a three-part panel interview with an engineer on the team, the hiring manager, and someone on the early careers program.
First screening round, followed by a panel interview. This included three loop interviews in one day. The first screening round went well. I did not hear back from them after this. The interviewer was really helpful and asked good questions.
A recruiter contacted me through LinkedIn. I scheduled a phone screen with a manager. Phone Screen (40 minutes): I had to solve an easy algorithm problem. I solved the problem in around 20 minutes. Then, the manager asked me a lot of random question
The process started with a recruiter call. Then, I had a technical screening. Lastly, there was a three-part panel interview with an engineer on the team, the hiring manager, and someone on the early careers program.
First screening round, followed by a panel interview. This included three loop interviews in one day. The first screening round went well. I did not hear back from them after this. The interviewer was really helpful and asked good questions.
A recruiter contacted me through LinkedIn. I scheduled a phone screen with a manager. Phone Screen (40 minutes): I had to solve an easy algorithm problem. I solved the problem in around 20 minutes. Then, the manager asked me a lot of random question