Rewards results. Plenty of interesting work. Many smart peers to learn from. Competent executives. Demands excellence all around. Fun environment.
Not many cons if you are the work hard, play hard type. It demands commitment, texting at all hours if there is a need, and may be too competitive for some.
Keep it going, keep taking risks, keep company culture competitive and hungry, keep hiring standards high, and find the right balance between being meticulous versus productive.
Overall smooth. Had 3 interviews: one behavioral and 2 technical. Heavy system design and debugging. Interviewers were nice, standard interview format with an introduction and then mostly technical questions. Some OOP concepts needed as well.
It was a pretty standard big tech interview process. At a high level, it had the following steps: * Recruiter call * Hiring Manager screen * Technical phone screen * Onsite
One interview, supposed to be with the hiring manager, was followed by a group of three interviews. These interviews were primarily focused on computer architecture and verification concepts. There was also some coding related to these computer archi
Overall smooth. Had 3 interviews: one behavioral and 2 technical. Heavy system design and debugging. Interviewers were nice, standard interview format with an introduction and then mostly technical questions. Some OOP concepts needed as well.
It was a pretty standard big tech interview process. At a high level, it had the following steps: * Recruiter call * Hiring Manager screen * Technical phone screen * Onsite
One interview, supposed to be with the hiring manager, was followed by a group of three interviews. These interviews were primarily focused on computer architecture and verification concepts. There was also some coding related to these computer archi