Pros: I have been here for more than 6 years, so I guess the pay is good for me. I don't know about others. Work-life balance is good. If I want to do something new, I can, as long as it has a clear alignment with the goals of the company.

Cons: - No one knows what your expected pay amount is, so you don't know when you get raises or RSUs and for how much. - The industry is old, so there is little innovation. You get a 20-year-old RFC as input and should give code as the output. After some time, it feels repetitive.

Pros: Great team support. Friendly environment. Developer-driven roadmap.

Cons: Uncertain vision of career progress.

Pros: You learn early on about "Arista culture": everybody can contribute everywhere they feel capable. You are also encouraged to initiate direct contact with the right people in the company to get input on problems you're working on (and there are a lot of really smart people). There is no more than the bare minimum of hierarchy or bureaucracy to deal with. There are separate teams, but you aren't limited to working on one thing (other than by your available time). You are encouraged to move around to different projects as you learn more and interests change. Your performance is evaluated primarily by your peers, using a nerdy data-driven approach, while managers provide sober second thought. The company itself is doing great things and poised for greater still. It delivers a product people love in an industry that's growing like crazy, and equity compensation gives you a stake in it.

Cons: The Burnaby office location is not the greatest for taking transit to work. Software is largely written in an arcane proprietary TACC language, which has some technical advantages but is mostly used for historical reasons or inertia. The codebase is managed by Perforce, which makes tracking history and making small, nimble changes a chore—though there are ongoing efforts to improve developer tooling, including Git integration.