Pros: - Best work-life balance - Focus on mental health - Employee first - Great benefits

Cons: Growing pains of scaling

Pros: Open culture, generous perks: free food, fitness classes, flexi-hours, great hardware.

Cons: There hasn't been much innovation in the company. It has grown by acquisitions, and there hasn't been any in-house development of a new product in the last decade. It's mostly running on the money brought in by the JIRA machine. Middle management lacks people management skills. There is a lot of groupism and favoritism. If you are part of 'the group,' you'll get promoted, but if you don't 'show loyalty,' you'll be sidelined and forced to move out. It's a classic case of long-term employees being promoted to middle management without any training. In my team, one couldn't question the decisions of the leads. This was purported as a 'team value.' There was a lot of micromanagement. Your disagreements could be highlighted as 'not playing as a team' during 1-1s. It wasn't an 'Open company' to me. One's comments on the internal wiki or messages in the public (internal) chat rooms could be used negatively during annual reviews by the lead.

Pros: Stock price, free food, some smart people. Flexible working depending on your manager.

Cons: Office politics, and in some business units, there is a rapid increase in hiring externals rather than developing talent and promoting internal staff. This minimizes some career opportunities for staff. Promotions are decided on favoritism. If you are a woman in development, then there are better places than here. Though it claims to be an employee-friendly company, a lot of changes in the recent past are worrisome.