The interview process involved a HackerRank test (3 questions, 90 minutes), a technical interview (one question that was easier than the HackerRank test), and a behavioral interview, spanning about 4 weeks.

During the behavioral interview, I mostly talked about my projects. It was a surprisingly pleasant experience; I enjoyed working with both of my interviewers.

The HackerRank test was fairly difficult. I only passed all the tests for one question, I had almost finished another, and there was one where I couldn't figure out a vital optimization technique at all.

The technical interview question was much easier, and it seemed like they were more intent on learning about my thought process for it.

Tell us about a time something went wrong with one of your projects/assignments.

What happened, and what would you do differently in the future to avoid running into that issue again?