The company actively has extremely interesting distributed systems and front-end work at scale. It seeks transparency, encourages openness, fosters broad responsibilities and cross-team communication, and especially strives to avoid hiring toxic personalities that aren't team players.
The company has grown massively in the last year. Everyone needs to be comfortable with and adapt to changes frequently. I guess the interesting work and booming stock are accompanied by some rising entropy as well.
I first spoke with the hiring manager one-on-one. I insisted on visiting the office for that, so I could see the environment for myself. I had multiple rounds of interviews after that. During the onsite, I spoke with five people: * One technical * T
I had a 30-minute call with a recruiter, who then said he would have a conversation with a hiring manager in a few days. After 20 days, I emailed for closure, and finally 23 days after that first call, I was told they were not moving forward with me
Standard phone screening, management interview, followed by a technical interview. The technical interview was a joke. They could have prepared better; they didn’t even ask me to introduce myself. It feels like the company uses job applicants as gui
I first spoke with the hiring manager one-on-one. I insisted on visiting the office for that, so I could see the environment for myself. I had multiple rounds of interviews after that. During the onsite, I spoke with five people: * One technical * T
I had a 30-minute call with a recruiter, who then said he would have a conversation with a hiring manager in a few days. After 20 days, I emailed for closure, and finally 23 days after that first call, I was told they were not moving forward with me
Standard phone screening, management interview, followed by a technical interview. The technical interview was a joke. They could have prepared better; they didn’t even ask me to introduce myself. It feels like the company uses job applicants as gui