Exceptional technological people in the software dev groups.
Poor leadership; need to stay current with technology advances.
Consider alternate routes to the same goal.
The first couple of interviews consisted of questions around C++ and multithreading. Then there were questions related to the banking business. We also discussed bonuses and compensation, which are still pretty good.
Very bad. Fully luck based; cannot be any other criteria. Interviewers do not much themselves. Also, no planning by the HR team. 300+ interviewed and 100+ got selected, so you can guess.
There are only two rounds: one is technical, and the second is the manager round. They basically look for how efficient you are at taking ownership of things and how efficient you are at having clear communication with users.
The first couple of interviews consisted of questions around C++ and multithreading. Then there were questions related to the banking business. We also discussed bonuses and compensation, which are still pretty good.
Very bad. Fully luck based; cannot be any other criteria. Interviewers do not much themselves. Also, no planning by the HR team. 300+ interviewed and 100+ got selected, so you can guess.
There are only two rounds: one is technical, and the second is the manager round. They basically look for how efficient you are at taking ownership of things and how efficient you are at having clear communication with users.