Good work-life balance. Good insurance benefits. Good for a person to settle for a relaxed life.
Poor management. Doesn't recognize employee potential.
We do understand that firing employees is important for cost-cutting (firm's health).
However, even at normal times (when a project is completed), as a first option, try to redeploy permanent employees rather than just firing them. The indirect costs are much higher.
This doesn't encourage creativity and innovation. Rather, it encourages politics (among employees). The work won't progress, but everyone just tries to retain some core part of the work.
Mislead managers so as to extend projects. I saw several of my colleagues doing this.
A six-month's work is extended for 1.5 years, creating havoc by a team of 7 (heavy upgrade and maintenance costs).
It takes years to build culture and days to spoil it.
HR, Manager, and then technical.
The first round is a technical interview, including coding questions and questions about your past experiences. The second round is a behavioral interview, which talks more about the role's responsibilities and the team. It will also ask about yourse
Horrible. It seems like the recruiter is not interested in you at all. The communication between the applicants and the company itself is nonexistent. The application process starts off with a resume screening and OA, after which they contact you aft
HR, Manager, and then technical.
The first round is a technical interview, including coding questions and questions about your past experiences. The second round is a behavioral interview, which talks more about the role's responsibilities and the team. It will also ask about yourse
Horrible. It seems like the recruiter is not interested in you at all. The communication between the applicants and the company itself is nonexistent. The application process starts off with a resume screening and OA, after which they contact you aft