Little overtime. Tremendous 'work from home' ability. Generous benefits. Lots of internal opportunities.
Much of your time will be wasted in meetings ranging from the unnecessary to the absurd. Knowledge and abilities outside your pigeon-hole are not understood or recognized. Extremely meeting-centric. Be there or be square. The only way to find out what is going on in large projects is to sit in meetings that literally last all day, day after day. Technologies are often outdated. Extremely stingy on the expense allowance. Extremely limited travel opportunities. Dissent is generally not welcome.
Get rid of the performance reviews. They accomplish nothing.
We have to report our time every week, yet nothing is done with the information.
Throttle back on the 'recognition' and other propaganda. Less is more in that area.
Do away with 'customer listening' - a complete waste of time.
A recruiter from Modis notified me of about 30 developer positions in both Java and .NET. Mine was for a .NET developer candidacy. Recruiter called to ask about my resume and my experience, and then pitched my resume to the BOA team. The BOA team ap
It was a face-to-face interview, and the panel had 2 members. They were well organized. The interview was for about 20 minutes. They were looking for candidates with different levels of skills/experience.
The interview was for name's sake. The panel said before the introduction that I shouldn't go in-depth and didn't ask any questions to understand my knowledge of the subject. They simply wasted time talking out of subject. Later, I heard that the pan
A recruiter from Modis notified me of about 30 developer positions in both Java and .NET. Mine was for a .NET developer candidacy. Recruiter called to ask about my resume and my experience, and then pitched my resume to the BOA team. The BOA team ap
It was a face-to-face interview, and the panel had 2 members. They were well organized. The interview was for about 20 minutes. They were looking for candidates with different levels of skills/experience.
The interview was for name's sake. The panel said before the introduction that I shouldn't go in-depth and didn't ask any questions to understand my knowledge of the subject. They simply wasted time talking out of subject. Later, I heard that the pan