Interesting work. Good exposure. Good benefits.
Not much I can think of.
Most of the interview was technical questions, with 5 minutes at the end for Q&A. The interviewer was nice. I had to handwrite code on a piece of paper. The questions built on one another.
The phone interviewer forgot to call me the first time. I had to email the recruiter to reschedule the interview. The on-site experience was not good either. The interview started half an hour late. They told me there would be two interviewers for t
On average, the questions covered basic algorithm concepts. However, the interviewer was not coherent in his description of the problem and the way he wanted it solved. Knowledge of basic data structures and algorithms would suffice to get through th
Most of the interview was technical questions, with 5 minutes at the end for Q&A. The interviewer was nice. I had to handwrite code on a piece of paper. The questions built on one another.
The phone interviewer forgot to call me the first time. I had to email the recruiter to reschedule the interview. The on-site experience was not good either. The interview started half an hour late. They told me there would be two interviewers for t
On average, the questions covered basic algorithm concepts. However, the interviewer was not coherent in his description of the problem and the way he wanted it solved. Knowledge of basic data structures and algorithms would suffice to get through th