Great office building. Good salary, benefits, year-over-year raises and bonuses (on good years). Company picnic is fun. Free member access to museums. If you are in the right group, you'll find interesting technology and enough autonomy where you can go crazy and learn a lot. Relatively flexible hours. I didn't work too many hours each week (45/50 max), and I showed up at around 9:30/10:00 AM and left later with nobody really caring (this depends on the group, though).
Poor management that was really out of touch with developer needs.
Reliance on poor proprietary technologies that hamstrung what you were capable of accomplishing.
Deadlines and project management that would discourage building good software just to "get it done and released." Oftentimes, this would result in things getting out of control very fast.
Very poor testing and development environment. Time was never allotted for testing software, and the development environment was often broken or not a good proxy for the production system.
A slow but noticeable reduction in quality of benefits. When I first joined, there was better food in the pantry (healthier), more cultural events, and more volunteering events. That all seemed to go away.
A severe lack of men's restrooms. Sometimes you'd have to walk up or down two or three flights to find a free stall.
Generally very crowded and cramped work environment. Everyone sits right on top of each other, and so there is plenty of distraction. When people get sick, everyone gets sick. The elevator banks were worse than the 6 train below the building during rush hour.
Decisions about products are made without much input from the developers. Managers and business people were in a world of their own, and developers are treated as contractors when it comes to their influence over products.
You hire a lot of very smart people.
Try to let them use their brains.
Maybe take a note from Google or Facebook on how to run an office full of developers.
Multiple rounds of technical interviews. Didn't get passed round one despite answering all the questions and any followups they had. It was two LeetCode questions, and you would write out your code on a HackerRank interface.
Had three rounds. Be sure to speak more! Communication matters. It's okay if you do not have clues at first, but you need to talk to them about how you think of the problem, and they will guide you through it.
It was a straightforward experience. I talked about my resume for around 10 minutes and then solved a LeetCode-style question. Afterwards, there was an opportunity to ask the interviewer questions about Bloomberg.
Multiple rounds of technical interviews. Didn't get passed round one despite answering all the questions and any followups they had. It was two LeetCode questions, and you would write out your code on a HackerRank interface.
Had three rounds. Be sure to speak more! Communication matters. It's okay if you do not have clues at first, but you need to talk to them about how you think of the problem, and they will guide you through it.
It was a straightforward experience. I talked about my resume for around 10 minutes and then solved a LeetCode-style question. Afterwards, there was an opportunity to ask the interviewer questions about Bloomberg.