It's stable for the most part. Benefits aren't bad. A good place to begin a career, but not a great place to stay unless you value stability over innovation.
Ponderous, bureaucratic, the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing. Paralyzed by indecision in many groups. Often had to hold initial meetings to decide how many meetings would be needed to make a decision, rather than just making the decision then and there. While pay and benefits aren't stellar, they are decent and reasonably stable. Some employees end up sticking around for the benefits rather than for any reasons related to pride in job or faith in senior management, which can lead to apathy amongst the lifers.
Shrug
Not bad, but since the software test is in pen and paper, you should practice pseudocode and not cheat. Interviews are now in the post-AI era, where companies use it extensively or not at all.
Though it was pre-recorded, there was one behavioral question, one coding question, and one recording of you explaining your solution. The question was impossible, and I later looked it up to see it wasn’t actually solvable.
Three engineers interviewed me at my university during a career fair. Two were mechanical, and one was a DevOps engineer. They introduced themselves and asked me some questions. Overall, it was very relaxed.
Not bad, but since the software test is in pen and paper, you should practice pseudocode and not cheat. Interviews are now in the post-AI era, where companies use it extensively or not at all.
Though it was pre-recorded, there was one behavioral question, one coding question, and one recording of you explaining your solution. The question was impossible, and I later looked it up to see it wasn’t actually solvable.
Three engineers interviewed me at my university during a career fair. Two were mechanical, and one was a DevOps engineer. They introduced themselves and asked me some questions. Overall, it was very relaxed.