The interview process was standard, similar to other companies. I applied for multiple positions and was placed on the application team.
I first received coding challenges and completed them, then scheduled a tech screen. Subsequently, the recruiter sent me an email stating I was given the wrong coding challenge and had to redo it. I had to do it again, which was the same set of problems with one problem less.
After that, I scheduled a new tech screen to fit my schedule since I had other interviews, though they kept my old tech screen schedule. The tech screen was great; a friendly and professional engineer presented a LeetCode medium problem.
So, I got the onsite interview, and I sent an email to the recruiter for information, such as what I should expect and the topics for each round. The recruiter never responded.
The onsite was okay, with 3 rounds covering LeetCode medium and OOD. Although all interviewers arrived late and seemed rushed, averaging about 30 minutes per round, they were friendly and helpful.
Nevertheless, I was still rejected, and I asked for feedback. Again, there was no response from the recruiter.
Overall, the engineers were good, but the recruiter was unprofessional and never responded to emails.
Leetcode Medium
Tags:
The following metrics were computed from 67 interview experiences for the C3.ai Software Engineer role in United States.
C3.ai's interview process for their Software Engineer roles in the United States is very selective, failing most engineers who go through it.
Candidates reported having mixed feelings for C3.ai's Software Engineer interview process in United States.