I was emailed by an HR representative to set up a 30-minute phone interview with a Solution Leader. They never called me at the scheduled time. They had to reschedule for the next day, which required me to cancel a meeting at my current work. So unprofessional!
The phone screen focused on my past experience and my exposure to ML/AI. More specifically, they wanted to know if I had any experience collecting requirements from clients and providing them to a development team for a project/solution. They wanted to know how I keep a clear line of communication with clients. Finally, we talked about my understanding of AI/ML.
The process took two weeks and included a background interview and a writing assignment. The writing assignment was to present five use cases in the federal government where ML/AI could help solve problems. I feel like this is an easy way to steal people's ideas. However, they want you to "dumb down" ML/AI and present it in a use case for a federal client. It's also a great way for them to assess your understanding of federal problems and how to recommend a solution with ML/AI.
After seven days of superior research and probably writing the best paper of my life, I received a rejection email the next day stating they could not proceed with my writing assignment.
Background
4-Page Machine Learning (ML) / Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use Case Assignment:
If a federal client had a problem, how can ML/AI solve the problem and save the client money?
The following metrics were computed from 1 interview experience for the C3.ai Solution Lead role in Washington, District of Columbia.
C3.ai's interview process for their Solution Lead roles in Washington, District of Columbia is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having very negative feelings for C3.ai's Solution Lead interview process in Washington, District of Columbia.