Pros: It can be a great place for a software engineer who likes innovating. I really admire the Head of Engineering's mindset (Brendan Humphrey) and how they are driving AI adoption. Also, there are lots of benefits, events, and food in the office.

Cons: Toxic leadership. Not all of them, of course. Some are indeed great. However, I've heard just too many stories in a short time, and it seems quite alarming, quite above the market average. My advice is: if you feel something is wrong and your leader is not telling you, watch out! Some characteristics to pay attention to in your leader: * dismissive * incompetent * does not assign you much work * doesn't take accountability * blames others If you see any or a few of those traits in your leader, my suggestion is to try to find another team, either within the company or outside, as a matter of urgency.

Pros: Good in-office perks: great coffee, lunch. Great vibe at the top.

Cons: My team was toxic. There seemed to be a disconnect between development and where the decisions were being made.

Pros: Good product, remote-friendly, decent office, and working with smart engineers.

Cons: - Growth for software engineers is slow. Managers will hold a carrot on a stick and are unsupportive. - Processes are horrible; things move extremely slowly despite having unreasonable deadlines. - Work hours are getting worse; it's not uncommon to work 60-hour weeks. - Some teams are extremely toxic with high attrition. I've seen five people leave the company from one team within the last six months. Toxicity is coming from group leads themselves. - Pay is not worth the stress. On-call rates are terrible despite getting woken up to alerts at 2 AM weekly. I had a better experience working at AWS.