I applied for a position on LinkedIn and also messaged the recruiter directly. I received a prompt response indicating they would like to interview me, likely due to my message.

They sent a coding challenge through CodeSignal focused on algorithms. The challenge consisted of three questions with increasing difficulty. I completed and passed the first question, completed most tests for the second, and partially completed the third. Despite not fully completing the third question, I moved on to the final rounds of interviews, referred to as "Power Day."

I had four back-to-back interviews:

• Architectural and Technical: The first was architectural and technical. The interviewer asked me to design a credit card information and application page, followed by a confirmation page. The interview was mainly conversational, though they provided a screen whiteboard for notes if needed.
• Technical (Position Specific): The second interview was technical and specific to the position. It focused on a React project. The interviewer was interested in how I built components, my syntax, and my overall coding style. The project was straightforward and directly related to the position.
• Behavioral: The third interview was behavioral. The interviewer initially had difficulty understanding my responses and repeated questions until they were clarified. The questions were quite monotonous and heavily focused on a single project from my past, which made the interview feel repetitive.
• Case Study: The fourth interview was a case. It was slightly technical but did not involve actual coding. The scenario involved identifying a bug in a budgeting program developed by an intern. I had to find the bug in code written in one of several languages (Java, C++, Node.js, Python) without coding the solution.

They got back to me in less than 24 hours with feedback.

The first interview involved designing a credit card information and application page, followed by a confirmation page. The discussion was mainly conversational, though a screen whiteboard was available for notes if needed.

The second interview was technical and specific to the position, focusing on a React project. The interviewer was interested in how I built components, my syntax, and my overall coding style. The project was straightforward and directly related to the position.

The third interview was behavioral. The interviewer initially had difficulty understanding my responses and repeated questions until they were clarified. The questions were quite monotonous and heavily focused on a single project from my past, which made the interview feel repetitive.

The fourth interview was a case study. It was slightly technical but did not involve actual coding. The scenario involved identifying a bug in a budgeting program developed by an intern. I had to find the bug in code written in one of several languages (Java, C++, Node.js, Python) without coding the solution.