Employee-focused company with decent benefits
Employee-focused company with decent benefits
- Employee-focused HR practices
- Unlimited PTO
- Self-paced goals
-
Experience is team-dependent, and some of them have cut-throat competition.
-
Discussions sometimes last too long as a consequence of the "Debate Openly; Commit Fully" principle.
Additional Ratings
Was this helpful?
Chewy Interview Questions
Chewy Interview Experiences
Software Engineer II
Step 1: Apply to the role. Step 2: If selected, a recruiter will contact you. Step 3: Recruiter call. Step 4: 1-hour interview with one of their engineers (30 minutes of technical questions and a 30-minute coding round on HackerRank). Step 5: 4-h
Software Engineer II
The first interviewer did not show up at all to a four-hour interview Chewy scheduled, and then Chewy rejected me the next day. Neither the interviewer nor the recruiter bothered to reach out when the first interviewer missed the interview. During
Software Engineer II
Incredibly inconsistent experience. Recruiter set me up with a team I would not be able to work with due to time difference. Interviewers were not consistent in how they interviewed. Three of the five were good. One coding interview: the interview
Software Engineer II
Boston, Massachusetts, United StatesMarch 27, 2025Step 1: Apply to the role. Step 2: If selected, a recruiter will contact you. Step 3: Recruiter call. Step 4: 1-hour interview with one of their engineers (30 minutes of technical questions and a 30-minute coding round on HackerRank). Step 5: 4-h
Software Engineer II
United StatesDecember 1, 2021The first interviewer did not show up at all to a four-hour interview Chewy scheduled, and then Chewy rejected me the next day. Neither the interviewer nor the recruiter bothered to reach out when the first interviewer missed the interview. During
Software Engineer II
Bellevue, Washington, United StatesMay 1, 2023Incredibly inconsistent experience. Recruiter set me up with a team I would not be able to work with due to time difference. Interviewers were not consistent in how they interviewed. Three of the five were good. One coding interview: the interview
