Co-workers are brilliant, empathetic, and kind. There is an energy there that really gets you firing on all cylinders. It's exhilarating and satisfying. The market opportunity is huge; everyone is aligned on the mission, and we are executing more effectively than any company I've ever worked for.
Culture can feel a little stiff sometimes, like overly professional.
Also, the company hasn't invested as much as it could in making processes more efficient and improving internal tooling. This is most likely a product of immensely fast growth.
Edit: After reading some other reviews, I want to add some more details.
There is a contingent of jaded old-guard OG employees who are upset the company isn't the same company they joined when they were employee no. 50 and their boss's boss was Jay Kreps himself.
They are upset about the very existence of middle management at the company. They are upset that coordinating with other teams is harder now. I get it. If you are the kind of person who wants to work at a 50-person company, you are probably not going to enjoy working at a 1000+ person company. The only reason they are still here is because of IPO potential.
So, if you join Confluent, you have to tolerate these people and their mildly toxic attitudes. Personally, it's not a big deal for me.
Confluent's not perfect, and there are certainly pain points, growing pains, dysfunctional processes, questionable hires, and bungled projects. Every company has this, though.
What makes Confluent special is we notice the problems and fix them quickly. Upper management is swift and decisive, the engineers are truly world-class, we are all aligned on the mission, and we are making it happen.
Keep the talent bar high and keep hiring people that are not only brilliant, but also a joy to work with.
The interview process at Confluent usually involves: * A coding challenge * A phone screen * An onsite loop with multiple interviews
I went through three technical rounds. The interviews were interesting, but after that, they didn't respond. They didn't provide the results of the process, which was not professional on their part.
I interviewed for an entry-level frontend engineer position. There were four rounds: * A qualifying HackerRank assessment * Two technical interviews * A final round with the hiring manager The process moved quickly, which was refreshing. In m
The interview process at Confluent usually involves: * A coding challenge * A phone screen * An onsite loop with multiple interviews
I went through three technical rounds. The interviews were interesting, but after that, they didn't respond. They didn't provide the results of the process, which was not professional on their part.
I interviewed for an entry-level frontend engineer position. There were four rounds: * A qualifying HackerRank assessment * Two technical interviews * A final round with the hiring manager The process moved quickly, which was refreshing. In m