A competitive expatriate package is the only positive.
My tenure at Coupang has been quite demanding. While the company attracts expatriates with enticing compensation packages, the overall experience often falls short of expectations. The communication dynamics create an atmosphere that more closely resembles a strict regime than a collaborative workplace.
The explicitly communicated hierarchical culture, with a discouragement of using one's intellect, raises questions about the wisdom of hiring senior professionals at substantial pay scales only to limit their autonomy.
Additionally, the frequent use of personal compensation comparisons by managers fosters an uncomfortable atmosphere, hinting at a broader issue within the company's management practices.
Considering these challenges, I strongly discourage anyone from considering Coupang as an employer. The negative aspects of the work environment and management practices make it an unattractive option for potential employees.
There is a significant need for management at Coupang to improve their treatment of employees and adopt a less regimented approach.
The company should prioritize talent development, an aspect that seems to be currently neglected.
Unfortunately, there is a lack of support for any form of talent development or growth, with the company emphasizing that they pay for the work and not for investing in the professional growth of their employees. This mindset, which insists that talent must meet current requirements without recognizing the importance of ongoing development, is a notable shortcoming.
It's crucial for Coupang to realize that their attrition rate is currently the highest in the industry. This should serve as a clear indication that a reevaluation of their approach to talent management is necessary. Focusing on talent development and creating an environment that fosters growth could significantly contribute to reducing attrition rates and ensuring the company remains competitive in retaining skilled professionals.
Recruiter did never get back. The interview process was similar to Amazon, including leadership principles and related questions. Technical questions were also similar to those at other product companies. DSA focused on hard problems, time complexity
The interview consists of four rounds. The first two focus on coding challenges to assess algorithmic skills and problem-solving ability. The third and fourth emphasize system design, evaluating scalability, architecture, and trade-offs. Each roun
There were a total of 4 technical rounds: 1st - DSA round 2nd - DSA 3rd - Design round 4th - Focus round After the first two rounds, there can be an elimination. After the fourth round, there will be a Bar Raiser round.
Recruiter did never get back. The interview process was similar to Amazon, including leadership principles and related questions. Technical questions were also similar to those at other product companies. DSA focused on hard problems, time complexity
The interview consists of four rounds. The first two focus on coding challenges to assess algorithmic skills and problem-solving ability. The third and fourth emphasize system design, evaluating scalability, architecture, and trade-offs. Each roun
There were a total of 4 technical rounds: 1st - DSA round 2nd - DSA 3rd - Design round 4th - Focus round After the first two rounds, there can be an elimination. After the fourth round, there will be a Bar Raiser round.