Pros: Great work-life balance, pay is good, and lunch is good.

Cons: Process in place is getting large.

Pros: There can be clearer boundaries between work and personal life, as well as a structured environment that aids in maintaining work-life balance.

Cons: Challenges in team collaboration, potential for decreased communication, difficulties in maintaining company culture.

Pros: The company is just over the cusp of moving from being a small company to a large one. Lots of the tools and processes are ripe for growing to the next generation. There's a positive feedback loop of the products making customers better at delivery, and thus having new challenges to face, for which we can develop new products. The culture encourages work-life balance. 70-hour weeks are not expected or encouraged. A hybrid 3-day/week in-office setup is ideal for me. Competitive salary and benefits are offered. High-level decisions seem to be made thoughtfully. Global teams help prevent group-think.

Cons: - Eng teams tend to design 1-2 quarters out, for well-known paths only, instead of gathering broad requirements to design for 1-2 years out while implementing incrementally. - Four years of rapid growth has left much technical debt, but this is also an opportunity for great projects. - Global teams mean you spend a lot of time in VC. - Hints of NIH syndrome (but not nearly as much as at previous employer).