Some smart folks to work with. Compensation is good in some groups.
Really, no innovation in the work. Copycat strategies, and the leadership barely has any vision. Hordes of clueless MBAs are driving strategy sometimes. It's a top-heavy organization with leadership mostly comprising of old folks who are out of touch with the current tech landscape or how to improve margins other than by cutting costs.
3 technical rounds: * Coding: data structures (linked list, binary trees, bitwise operators) * Locks, concurrency, synchronization * Questions based on resume * Operating systems questions: paging, interrupts 1 management round 1 HR round
There were three rounds of interviews, two of which were technical. The technical rounds were quite in-depth and really measured the candidate's knowledge. For an individual familiar with the platform, it was not too overwhelming.
A panel interview occurred over three days. Each candidate seems to have had a different experience. There were no standard operating procedures for small team and contractor interviews. I began as a contractor, as it tends to be a good route to g
3 technical rounds: * Coding: data structures (linked list, binary trees, bitwise operators) * Locks, concurrency, synchronization * Questions based on resume * Operating systems questions: paging, interrupts 1 management round 1 HR round
There were three rounds of interviews, two of which were technical. The technical rounds were quite in-depth and really measured the candidate's knowledge. For an individual familiar with the platform, it was not too overwhelming.
A panel interview occurred over three days. Each candidate seems to have had a different experience. There were no standard operating procedures for small team and contractor interviews. I began as a contractor, as it tends to be a good route to g