Competitive salary, ethical company concerned with well-being.
It is not possible to choose the preferred operating system (they use Windows).
Excessive bureaucracy; even to install everyday software, it is necessary to open a "ticket".
Tedious development tasks, 80% is focused on compliance.
They use XP (Extreme Programming), with pair programming 100% of the time.
Internal documentation is not clear.
Promotions take a very long time to happen.
Did I already mention the bureaucracy?
Se quiserem manter seus desenvolvedores, precisam desburocratizar um pouco.
1st round: I was contacted by a manager of one of their software dev teams to do a phone screening, which took about 30 minutes. The manager spent 15 minutes talking about the project that her group was working on, then asked about my background. The
The interview was verbose. It took me 6 hours to finish. The questions they asked were simple and tedious, making it not a good interview experience. I hope there will be more technical detail discussion in the future.
The technical interview process was quite simple. It was in Java and mainly focused on OOP. Unfortunately, I did not move on to the next round. This was for an internship position located in the Bay Area. Neither of my friends moved on to the next ro
1st round: I was contacted by a manager of one of their software dev teams to do a phone screening, which took about 30 minutes. The manager spent 15 minutes talking about the project that her group was working on, then asked about my background. The
The interview was verbose. It took me 6 hours to finish. The questions they asked were simple and tedious, making it not a good interview experience. I hope there will be more technical detail discussion in the future.
The technical interview process was quite simple. It was in Java and mainly focused on OOP. Unfortunately, I did not move on to the next round. This was for an internship position located in the Bay Area. Neither of my friends moved on to the next ro