Like many others mentioned, it's Disney! The idea to contribute to Disney was hard to pass up. A few of the folks, as with any place, were awesome, helpful, and genuinely cared. The idea of a position at this company is a dream for some.
They usually hire contractors for the legally allowed 18 months (in California, with renewals every 6 months) before bringing them fully in. You don't actually get any Disney benefits for the first 1.5 years you are there. During that time, you are constantly reminded you are a contractor and "not Disney," as they say.
I was then treated as a regular employee and told to come into the office and attend meetings which were not part of the contract. I was spoken to aggressively in front of peers constantly by managers that weren't even mine. The manager hierarchy is strange, and everyone seems to be a manager.
It seemed to be an unnecessarily toxic environment where innovation was discouraged for the sake of keeping jobs/contracts, so as an engineer, you feel handcuffed. I was told weekly any of us could be "let go," which felt unnecessarily stressful.
I do understand everyone is under immense pressure and scrutiny at Disney, even management.
Perhaps rotating through contractors every 6-18 months prevents innovation, growth, and relationships from happening naturally, as everyone just becomes numbers when we're all people.
Very straightforward, simple technical analysis in Python. The interview focused more on soft skills than technical aspects to see if I was a team fit. The questions were great, and it was an overall great conversation. It did not feel like an interv
The interview process was quite quick. I went through three rounds with the team and multiple rounds with the recruiters beforehand. Overall, it was a good experience. The first round focused on "vibes," the second was more technical, and the third
There are two rounds: one with HR and one with managers. The manager interview is the one that matters. It's not as technical as you might think; soft skills are very important. Overall, it's not as difficult as you'd think, but definitely be prep
Very straightforward, simple technical analysis in Python. The interview focused more on soft skills than technical aspects to see if I was a team fit. The questions were great, and it was an overall great conversation. It did not feel like an interv
The interview process was quite quick. I went through three rounds with the team and multiple rounds with the recruiters beforehand. Overall, it was a good experience. The first round focused on "vibes," the second was more technical, and the third
There are two rounds: one with HR and one with managers. The manager interview is the one that matters. It's not as technical as you might think; soft skills are very important. Overall, it's not as difficult as you'd think, but definitely be prep