DK definitely asks people to work hard, but they have generous benefits (including tuition reimbursement) and fun extras (in-office massage, haircut, and manicures; snacks; discount tickets to games/concerts) as well as competitive salaries.
As part of the tech organization, I get to work on interesting projects alongside some very smart engineers.
We have all-hands meetings that are very transparent, and the CEO will answer any question honestly; you can even submit them anonymously ahead of time if you don't want to ask in front of everyone.
There is a very strong bias for action. This could be a good thing, but sometimes it is pushed too far and results in high stress for little net benefit.
The negative media attention can also be a pain. I work for a great company, love my job, and have a great career trajectory, but when people ask me about work, it is often in this hushed tone, as if they are embarrassedly asking about a relative with addiction problems.
Please keep it up! I have never worked for a leadership team that I believed in so strongly.
Phone screen with a higher management position. I didn't like the vibe of the interviewer. He seemed a bit aggressive and didn't have a clear idea of what he was looking for.
There is an OA given, probably creating an org chart. Then you get invited to an hour-long technical interview. No behavioral questions were asked; it was just one question with parts. I ran out of time, so I would say just be efficient with solving
OA -> Final round technical. Both were very similar, involving OOP with four parts. The OA was much harder than the final round. Both questions involved implementing a class related to business decisions.
Phone screen with a higher management position. I didn't like the vibe of the interviewer. He seemed a bit aggressive and didn't have a clear idea of what he was looking for.
There is an OA given, probably creating an org chart. Then you get invited to an hour-long technical interview. No behavioral questions were asked; it was just one question with parts. I ran out of time, so I would say just be efficient with solving
OA -> Final round technical. Both were very similar, involving OOP with four parts. The OA was much harder than the final round. Both questions involved implementing a class related to business decisions.