'LEAP' - Their technologist graduate program is exceptional. Six months of training, four of which are classroom-based. Professional external trainers teach everything from agile to public speaking to Spring MVC. They invest heavily in their young talent, and it pays.
Salary was competitive as a grad (in my location at least), as are annual salary increases (I averaged 8-10% per year entering as a grad, in several smaller bumps, enough even to stay on par with peers who job-hopped!), though I don't know how that scales for higher-ups. The performance/review process is formalized and well-run.
The work environment is very good: flexible work hours, good work/life balance, very little tolerance for toxic behavior, and good people. I usually work 40 hours and leave the office at 5 most days.
As a technologist, the office is still very male-dominated, though this is a problem everywhere for software engineers.
A lot of the salary/bonus structure is very clearly tied up in the overall company performance. During a recession or market downturn, the salary/bonus experience may be very different.
There seems to be a lot of politicking in the upper management. My team felt this through frequent group re-orgs, initiative changes, sudden U-turns on key priorities, etc.
Keep investing in your employees, and keep the huge BU re-orgs and site-unification strategies to a minimum as senior leaders move around.
In campus hiring, I cleared the technical interview but failed to clear the HR round. Simple questions were asked from various different topics on the resume and generally from core subjects.
The overall experience was good. DBMS-based questions were okay, but DSA, they asked so tough, we didn't know anything like TimSort. After that, they asked questions based on what answer you tell them.
Technical round and behaviour round. 1 hour technical and 1 hour behaviour. Only after you clear the technical round then you get to go to the behaviour round. The process is quite straightforward as compared to other companies.
In campus hiring, I cleared the technical interview but failed to clear the HR round. Simple questions were asked from various different topics on the resume and generally from core subjects.
The overall experience was good. DBMS-based questions were okay, but DSA, they asked so tough, we didn't know anything like TimSort. After that, they asked questions based on what answer you tell them.
Technical round and behaviour round. 1 hour technical and 1 hour behaviour. Only after you clear the technical round then you get to go to the behaviour round. The process is quite straightforward as compared to other companies.