Wage was reasonable. The technical resources of a large company. Being part of a team that introduced exciting products to market.
Despite an annual "career path" review, there were very limited opportunities for career growth.
In the time I was with the company, there was very little movement of people to help progress their careers; people tended to leave instead.
Frustration arose due to how the processes were implemented: one program would implement a "global" process one way, while another program would do it differently.
Lots of talk about making things better, but very little action.
Ghosted at scheduled time, no response. Very unprofessional, no response to follow up. Maybe it was just my recruiter, but I hope the process improves in the future if I'm ever in the process of interviewing here again.
2 rounds of interview 1. Recruiter screen 2. HM round: general questions 3. 3 people panel interview 4. 3 people panel interview 5. 3 people panel interview
It was a mid-level engineering position. Two interviewers (head of department and team lead) asked me three complex, advanced-level coding questions. My answers and output results were correct, but they asked me more questions related to the code, wh
Ghosted at scheduled time, no response. Very unprofessional, no response to follow up. Maybe it was just my recruiter, but I hope the process improves in the future if I'm ever in the process of interviewing here again.
2 rounds of interview 1. Recruiter screen 2. HM round: general questions 3. 3 people panel interview 4. 3 people panel interview 5. 3 people panel interview
It was a mid-level engineering position. Two interviewers (head of department and team lead) asked me three complex, advanced-level coding questions. My answers and output results were correct, but they asked me more questions related to the code, wh