Pros: - Good benefits - Unlimited PTO - Max out HSA - Work-life balance

Cons: Ever since the CEO stepped down, the company feels to me like it's heading south. Many of the teams are floating on their own without managers/directors or any form of leadership. They put in product managers who have zero vision to be in charge of managing important features of GitHub. From being fairly transparent, they have started a "hush-hush" culture where you don't know where and how decisions are being made. This is not at all a good time to join GitHub. They hire and they fire very quickly if you don't fit into their culture of all-talk and get no real work done. Politics is heavily rewarded. Honesty and speaking your mind is frowned upon.

Pros: The best part about working at GitHub is the great colleagues! They are uniformly friendly, super talented, and have a positive, supportive attitude. All the engineers I have worked with have been really motivated and produce high-quality work. A majority of GitHub employees work remotely; some in small satellite offices, but most at home, cafes, or shared office space, whatever. Because of this, the company goes to a lot of effort to make remote work effective. Communications are largely asynchronous (e.g., via GitHub issues and pull requests), most meetings are streamed and recorded, and there are lots of chances to meet other GitHubbers when necessary: the annual company summit, mini-summits for departments or teams kicking off a project, plus we are welcome to travel to visit HQ or other GitHubbers when we feel the urge to connect. Most "synchronous" discussion takes place in online chat, though even here transcripts are kept for anybody to read. Time zones can be a real hassle, but otherwise it all works quite well. It's so awesome being able to work for a San Francisco-based company while being able to live almost anywhere! The company is very transparent. Many company-wide issues are discussed in the open, and anybody's input is welcome. Until the beginning of 2014, GitHub didn't have any formal management structure to speak of. The result was predictable: people worked on what they found exciting, but it was hard to gather critical mass to implement large-scale projects. Since then, people-managers have been introduced, which has improved the company focus. So far, management has used a relatively light touch. In particular, work is still mostly organized by the engineers working on it rather than top-down by management. In my opinion, the introduction of management has improved the company, though it has definitely caused a shift in the culture. GitHub, the company, also seems to have a good heart. As far as I can tell, everybody at the company, from top to bottom, is really trying hard to do the right thing: * There is a constant internal dialog about how to improve diversity, both within GitHub (e.g., by doing everything we can to eliminate bias in our recruiting processes) and also within the whole industry (for example, by supporting organizations and events that are targeted at underrepresented groups). This isn't just an HR goal; we are all thinking about it. * We do everything we can to support open-source software. Most obviously, we provide free Git hosting to open-source projects, and we give our free users every bit the same level of support as we give to our paying customers. We contribute internally-developed code to upstream open-source projects as much as possible. We have "open-source Fridays" twice a month when GitHubbers are encouraged to work on open-source projects. We sponsor many open-source conferences and other events. * GitHub promotes a healthy work-life balance. I guess (being alpha-geeks) a lot of us work too many hours, but that pressure doesn't come from the company. I've never seen anything but encouragement for people announcing vacation (which is unlimited) or taking parental leave (4 months PTO for new parents). Finally, it's great to build a product that millions of people use and love. It's a pleasure to run into GitHub users in real life because they are so positive about the company. We're helping to propagate the open-source ethos: * We provide a great place for open-source projects to host their code. * Companies use GitHub to promote code-sharing and communal development internally, and often to open-source internal projects. * There are even governments that put draft legislation in GitHub and allow citizens to propose pull requests to change it. Reading back over what I've written, it sounds like I'm a marketing shill. But in fact, I'm just a very happy software engineer. After nearly two years at the company, I am still almost giddy that I get to work at GitHub.

Cons: Remote work impedes serendipitous communication. It's an effort to keep up with what is happening in the rest of the company when you don't bump into your colleagues in the kitchen or in the elevator. As a hangover from the management-free days, it can sometimes still be hard to figure out who is in charge of what.

Pros: - Salary and benefits are good - Remote

Cons: - Upper management reports directly into Microsoft in the absence of a CEO. - This leads to a lot of thrash, long hours, and often burnout in team members.