Pros: The best part about working at GitHub is the great colleagues! They are uniformly friendly, super talented, and have a positive, supportive attitude. All the engineers I have worked with have been really motivated and produce high-quality work. A majority of GitHub employees work remotely; some in small satellite offices, but most at home, cafes, or shared office space, whatever. Because of this, the company goes to a lot of effort to make remote work effective. Communications are largely asynchronous (e.g., via GitHub issues and pull requests), most meetings are streamed and recorded, and there are lots of chances to meet other GitHubbers when necessary: the annual company summit, mini-summits for departments or teams kicking off a project, plus we are welcome to travel to visit HQ or other GitHubbers when we feel the urge to connect. Most "synchronous" discussion takes place in online chat, though even here transcripts are kept for anybody to read. Time zones can be a real hassle, but otherwise it all works quite well. It's so awesome being able to work for a San Francisco-based company while being able to live almost anywhere! The company is very transparent. Many company-wide issues are discussed in the open, and anybody's input is welcome. Until the beginning of 2014, GitHub didn't have any formal management structure to speak of. The result was predictable: people worked on what they found exciting, but it was hard to gather critical mass to implement large-scale projects. Since then, people-managers have been introduced, which has improved the company focus. So far, management has used a relatively light touch. In particular, work is still mostly organized by the engineers working on it rather than top-down by management. In my opinion, the introduction of management has improved the company, though it has definitely caused a shift in the culture. GitHub, the company, also seems to have a good heart. As far as I can tell, everybody at the company, from top to bottom, is really trying hard to do the right thing: * There is a constant internal dialog about how to improve diversity, both within GitHub (e.g., by doing everything we can to eliminate bias in our recruiting processes) and also within the whole industry (for example, by supporting organizations and events that are targeted at underrepresented groups). This isn't just an HR goal; we are all thinking about it. * We do everything we can to support open-source software. Most obviously, we provide free Git hosting to open-source projects, and we give our free users every bit the same level of support as we give to our paying customers. We contribute internally-developed code to upstream open-source projects as much as possible. We have "open-source Fridays" twice a month when GitHubbers are encouraged to work on open-source projects. We sponsor many open-source conferences and other events. * GitHub promotes a healthy work-life balance. I guess (being alpha-geeks) a lot of us work too many hours, but that pressure doesn't come from the company. I've never seen anything but encouragement for people announcing vacation (which is unlimited) or taking parental leave (4 months PTO for new parents). Finally, it's great to build a product that millions of people use and love. It's a pleasure to run into GitHub users in real life because they are so positive about the company. We're helping to propagate the open-source ethos: * We provide a great place for open-source projects to host their code. * Companies use GitHub to promote code-sharing and communal development internally, and often to open-source internal projects. * There are even governments that put draft legislation in GitHub and allow citizens to propose pull requests to change it. Reading back over what I've written, it sounds like I'm a marketing shill. But in fact, I'm just a very happy software engineer. After nearly two years at the company, I am still almost giddy that I get to work at GitHub.

Cons: Remote work impedes serendipitous communication. It's an effort to keep up with what is happening in the rest of the company when you don't bump into your colleagues in the kitchen or in the elevator. As a hangover from the management-free days, it can sometimes still be hard to figure out who is in charge of what.

Pros: Fantastic people and focus on culture. Remote & work/life harmony. Great benefits. High level of autonomy and space to be creative. Surrounded by motivated and capable colleagues, leading to learning all the time.

Cons: Uncertainty around what'll come out of the Microsoft/GitHub union can be overwhelming at times.

Pros: Diversity: Depending on the position and location, income can be rewarding.

Cons: You can be underappreciated at the interview stage. If you accept a position at an unsatisfactory level, you can get stuck there for a long time, depending on the project you are on. Do not accept the position if you are not okay with how you were evaluated. It will affect you financially and morally in the long run. Microsoft dictates every important decision, and GitHub leadership made it sound like they have no say whatsoever. When confronted about the lack of salary increases this year, Domke, one of the highest-compensated people in the company, answered broadly that "we are here to do the best work of our lifetime, so it's not all about money." Wow! The communists called, they want their management playbook back! The benefits are constantly changing. They had an extensive list of working locations that was recently reduced to just a few for everyone, including existing employees. Bonuses were also lowered this year. So, one day you have a benefit, and the next day it might be gone. This is something completely legal, but to save you from suffering, you'd better forget about benefits since the probability here of them being taken away is high. Working fully remotely without ever meeting your colleagues is also a big no. We all like remote work, but never ever seeing anyone face to face contributes to low morale, low empathy, and ultimately higher friction and lower success.