I worked in the Technology division for 5 years.
I worked in the technology division of Goldman Sachs and I admire the smart people and technical courage of the company. The company truly believes in technology and is not afraid to build (and invest) in homegrown products, whereas other financial companies just live at the mercy of vendors and system integrators. You will be surprised at the scale and complexity of technical projects executed by Goldman on their own, without the involvement of any vendor or service integrator.
They take great pride and ownership in their work. The company outsources very little, and its products receive great attention from everyone. Managers pay great attention to detail. Goldman definitely seeks perfection in what they do.
Get used to executive worship culture. Goldman has MDs and Partners who are living gods in the corridors. This creates a culture of sycophancy and executive pleasing. I have seen people spend their days and nights not on working, but on pleasing.
Very New York Centered. New York is the absolute power center, and the managers there will share nothing with anyone else (even with other US cities). In other cities, you don't have the authority to do anything without triple New York approval.
All important projects are completely controlled out of NY, and if you are in other locations, you will find it hard to grow (or even breathe).
It's a company that encourages a culture where people work 20 hours a day. It's common to see colleagues work nonstop from 6:30 AM to Midnight.
Organizational Arrogance: Management has very firm views on what needs to be done, and you have little or no voice. It takes many years of service for anyone to have a voice in the company. Questioning or disagreement is almost always a career-limiting (or ending) move.
This arrogance leads to a culture where people spend their entire time building mega personas and hyper images of themselves. It's a culture where snobbery thrives.
The process took a very long time, but the interviews were friendly and positive. I had to talk to about four people. Their schedules and vacations made the process more drawn out.
The interview process consisted of four stages: * One conversation with the recruiter. * Two coding rounds: a system design round and a Coderpad round. * A final round with the hiring manager. The interview was smooth and straight to the point.
Initially, HR set up a round with employees who had around 12 years of experience at Goldman. The interviewer gave me a brief about the team for which they were assessing me and asked about my current role and a problem I was dealing with. First int
The process took a very long time, but the interviews were friendly and positive. I had to talk to about four people. Their schedules and vacations made the process more drawn out.
The interview process consisted of four stages: * One conversation with the recruiter. * Two coding rounds: a system design round and a Coderpad round. * A final round with the hiring manager. The interview was smooth and straight to the point.
Initially, HR set up a round with employees who had around 12 years of experience at Goldman. The interviewer gave me a brief about the team for which they were assessing me and asked about my current role and a problem I was dealing with. First int