Relatively flat structure. Individuals are greatly empowered. It's a fully profitable company, so no VC rubbish. Compensation is comparable to hedge funds.
Usual growing pains - bullshitters and bean-counters from big tech and consulting sometimes get promoted and put in charge of important decisions, general admin chaos, etc. But nothing that can't be fixed or is annoying enough to leave.
Make sure those who code and contribute move ahead.
It was good. Focus on arrays, strings, hash maps, trees/graphs, recursion, and dynamic programming. Many candidate guides mention these are common. Practice writing correct, efficient code with good time/space complexity; not just “it works” but “it
The interview process involved three rounds: * **Round 1: System Design** This was a creative and fun round to work through. The interviewers were supportive and positive, and I managed to clear this stage. * **Round 2: Theoretical ML/Live
The interview process started with a coding round, followed by a technical interview and then an HR round. In the coding round, there were two questions: one on DSA that was of medium-hard difficulty, and another question on machine learning.
It was good. Focus on arrays, strings, hash maps, trees/graphs, recursion, and dynamic programming. Many candidate guides mention these are common. Practice writing correct, efficient code with good time/space complexity; not just “it works” but “it
The interview process involved three rounds: * **Round 1: System Design** This was a creative and fun round to work through. The interviewers were supportive and positive, and I managed to clear this stage. * **Round 2: Theoretical ML/Live
The interview process started with a coding round, followed by a technical interview and then an HR round. In the coding round, there were two questions: one on DSA that was of medium-hard difficulty, and another question on machine learning.